Soup with a Little Toothpaste

Soup with a Little Toothpaste

Tina Turner "read" Edgar Allan Poe's books. Gombrowicz hated Balzak. In 1958 he wrote: "I hate his Human Comedy. Think how easily the best soup spoils when you add a teaspoon of old fat or a little toothpaste to it. (...) It's easier to hate someone for pobbing their nose than to love them for creating a symphony. Because the little thing is characteristic and defines a person in his daily dimension." (Diaries, Week, 1958). We read Gombrowicz.

And now, how to mix those random and often expired ingredients in our 5inKotle? Stir to the right, or rather to the left, to detire at least the moment when it will be revealed that what atCooked Perhaps To figure In the card (or rather on the panel: Order & collect) as Human comedy? Such is the fate of sustainable projects, foundations, institutions, and especially "cultural institutions". Their intention and goal is always to make a fuss to procure the symphony (sYmphonia Mundi), and over time they turn out to be a clump of smallness and rancid little things. If we add nutrients to this book pulp, we will try to get good quality, perennial, seasoned fat. It seems more and more significant. Because what happens if we start reading to describe as a process that results in pollution and waste? In many dystopias, books are something forbidden and destroyed as dangerous (for example, Ray Bradbury's novel Fahrenheit451). Reading and the carbon footprint are probably a timely enough topic. Atlas Sztuki of course and in this field also performs a number of studies. In the room in which the reader and the book are located, there are no unexpected changes in the parameters that we can record. We are able to record the change in indicators that are considered to be related to the neural correlates of consciousness {Neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) such as: electrical activity and oxygen consumption by areas of the brain}, perhaps hormonal activity. And that's it. It seems that, as in the case of the microcosm, what we know about reading is largely the result of deductive, non-empirical and inductive models.

Idem

View the complete Idem archive